Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Eileen Kennedy-Moore, PhD's avatar

Eileen Kennedy-Moore, PhD

Writes Dr. Friendtastic

Jun 7

Liked by Dr. Cara Goodwin, PhD

So glad you mentioned the confound in the correlational studies: parents who choose baby-led weaning are likely to be more educated/wealthier, which is associated with all kinds of things.

I also liked the comment about many parents not being purists and using a combination that works for them/their family. There are lots of ways to raise kids!

Another thing to keep in mind is that kids change. At one age a child might happily eat a variety of foods, a few months or a year later, they may turn picky, then later they might be more open to new foods.

Overall, the baby-led weaning seems very consistent with Ellyn Satter's approach to feeding older kids, which I find very sensible: https://www.ellynsatterinstitute.org/how-to-feed/ She emphasizes the division of responsibility: Parents decide what food to offer and when, and they try to make meals pleasant; kids decide what and how much of that food they want to eat. Patience and exposure help in getting kids to eat more varied foods. That's why Indian kids eat Indian food, and Chinese kids eat Chinese food, and Italian kids eat Italian food, etc.

One thing we know for sure is that stress and tension around eating/feeding makes both kids and parents miserable.

Expand full comment
Isabelle Mathewes's avatar

This is a great post! I was surprised to read that BLW parents tend to introduce solid foods later than traditional weaning parents; I would have expected it to be the other way around. Since that study is from the UK, I wonder if it's at all different in the US... I appreciated the conclusion sharing important information applicable to all styles of weaning; parents make the best choices they can with the information and resources available to them, and it's great that this article is useful even for parents not doing BLW!

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts