3 Comments
Jul 27, 2022·edited Jul 27, 2022

Hi, I thought I would let you know that the EWG is not a credible source of information. Many cosmetic scientists (chemist corner, eco well, colin's beauty pages) outlined the numerous flaws of their ''research'' and grading system.

The effect of sunscreen on Coral reef is also debatable: https://www.consumerreports.org/sunscreen/the-truth-about-reef-safe-sunscreen-a3578637894/

''A 2021 review, published in the journal Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, analyzed data from 12 studies of sunscreen ingredients and their effect on coral. The researchers concluded that while there is ample proof that UV filters are found in ocean waters, there is limited evidence that their presence is causing significant harm to coral reefs.

Yet, they said, it would be “premature to conclude that . . . UV filters do not adversely impact coral reefs.” The authors of this review—and other researchers—are calling for more studies that evaluate toxicity of sunscreen ingredients in real-world settings. ''

And at last....the reflected sun rays are not taken into consideration when you seek shade or wear a hat. Lab muffin beauty has a video on the topic. Sunscreen might be the safest option.

Expand full comment

Thanks, Dr. Goodwin, for your dive into sunscreens. I understand from several board-certified dermatologists (as well as food scientists and registered dieticians), that EWG is not a reliable source of information. They are heavily funded by the organic lobby and engage in fear mongering.

Expand full comment

Thanks for a very interesting and valuable write up! I would love to hear more of your interpretations of consequential but inconclusive ideas and debates where the research jury is still out to lunch. Maybe co-sleeping? Or plant-based babies? Strict bed times?

Expand full comment